Data annotation has become an increasingly popular way for people to make money working from home. The promise of good pay for flexible remote work annotating data to train AI algorithms is certainly enticing. However, with the rise of work-from-home scams, many are rightfully skeptical of these opportunities.
One major player in this space is DataAnnotation.tech. The site promises high hourly rates for projects annotating text, images, videos and more.
But with confusing application processes and scattered reviews ranging from glowing to outraged, it raises the question – is DataAnnotation.tech a legit company or an elaborate scam?
I’ve conducted extensive research into DataAnnotation.tech to uncover the truth, including: Analyzing trustpilot reviews and other independent reviews; Researching discussion forums like Reddit to find real user complaints; Comparing GlassDoor reviews from claimed employees; Checking scam warning sites to see if any flags are raised; And Attempting to verify company legitimacy through WHOIS lookups and address checks.
In this ultimate guide, I’ll share everything I learned through hours of investigation. You’ll see actual user reviews, breakdowns of suspicious activity, and an overall verdict on whether DataAnnotation.tech passes the sniff test or sets off scam alarms.
Let’s dig in!
Investigating Independent Reviews of DataAnnotation.tech
The most obvious place to start researching any online company is checking review sites. I analyzed reviews for DataAnnotation.tech across multiple high authority review platforms to gauge real user experiences.
Trustpilot Reviews – Abundance of Scam Accusations
Right away the Trustpilot reviews set off alarm bells – greeted with an overwhelmingly negative 2.3 star overall rating across 90 reviews.
The most common 1-star complaints:
No communication. Once work starts, users report being completely unable to contact support through any channels.
Payments withdrawn/withheld. Multiple users claim earned money has disappeared from their accounts unexpectedly.
Banned without explanation. Some users say after months of regular work, their accounts have suddenly been deactivated for unknown reasons.
While there are some positive Trustpilot reviews, the overwhelming amount of suspicious payment issues and lack of communication seem problematic.
ScamAdviser – Cautions on Potential Risks
ScamAdviser’s automated risk checker does show some positive signs for DataAnnotation.tech, like a long domain history and valid SSL certificate.
However, it notes the website owner is hiding their identity, and flags employee keywords that could indicate a work-from-home scam. ScamAdviser says sites like this must be vetted thoroughly, especially around payment practices.
So again we see warnings around the legitimacy – though the automated scan did not find clear scam evidence.
SiteJabber Reviews – Further Complaints
Checking SiteJabber reviews uncovers even more negative feedback:
- Multiple reports of never receiving payment for hours worked
- Difficulty contacting support to resolve missing payment issues
- Complex application processes with no communication
While SiteJabber had fewer total reviews vs TrustPilot, over three-quarters are just 1 star. Most call the company an outright scam, with similar payment and support complaints.
The Verdict on Independent Reviews
Across TrustPilot, SiteJabber, Reddit, and other sources, we find significant issues around lack of payment, support communication, and confusing/difficult application processes.
While there are some positive reviews on TrustPilot and Reddit, the overwhelming amount of suspicious user experiences sets off multiple red flags.
This abundance of suspicious payment problems and non-communication seems to indicate something questionable happening behind the scenes.
Analyzing Discussion Forums and Complaints
To dig deeper into real user experiences, I analyzed various discussion forums and complaint platforms covering DataAnnotation Tech. I uncovered three key issues reported by multiple unhappy applicants and contractors:
1. Rigged Assessments to Get Free Work
A common refrain across complaints is belief the long assessments applicants complete are just a way to get free data annotation work.
As this Redditor describes:
“I believe the “assessments” people are completing to show their abilities are actually just free work for them. There’s no way a legitimate company would have that convoluted multi-step process including actual full work without first hiring and paying employees.”
If true, this would allow DataAnnotation Tech to profit from applicant work without ever planning to hire them.
2. Arbitrary Account Deactivation
Multiple contractors report continuing to work successfully for months and suddenly having their accounts deactivated overnight.
A common theory is the company uses arbitrary deactivations to avoid paying higher-earning senior contractors. As one Redditor vented:
“They hired me at $30/hr, let me work over a year, then deactivated me out of nowhere. Obviously trying to cut costs – new contractors now start at $15/hr only. Scumbag move.”
While impossible to prove intent, the abundance of confused contractors makes this suspicious.
3. Impossible to Contact Support
Nearly every unhappy applicant or deactivated contractor reports being completely unable to contact DataAnnotation Tech support.
They claim submitted support tickets through the site or direct emails receive no replies. And with no phone number or live chat listed publicly, users have no recourse to dispute issues.
This lack of communication and accountability around alleged missing payments, deactivated accounts, and more, fuels the scam suspicions around the company.
Comparing GlassDoor Reviews From Alleged Employees
DataAnnotation Tech has a GlassDoor company profile with multiple employee reviews. And at first glance – they seem surprisingly positive compared to complaints elsewhere:
- 74% would recommend the company to a friend
- Multiple 5 star reviews praise interesting, flexible work
- Several claims of regular high payments
However, looking closer reveals some inconsistencies. Nearly all the positive GlassDoor reviews were added in 2023-2024. And many use very similar phrasing around flexibility and interest.
Yet our other research shows regular allegations of deactivated accounts and contractors unable to access any work. Both which seem at odds with the glowing flexibility descriptions on GlassDoor.
Plus, review platforms are notoriously susceptible to fake paid reviews. The clustered recent positive reviews, at odds with other evidence, seems questionable here.
Without further proof like confirmation of claimed employee identities, it’s impossible to say if these positive GlassDoor reviews truly come from legitimate satisfied workers.
Attempts to Verify Company Legitimacy
I tried multiple methods to independently verify DataAnnotation Tech as a legitimate business, including:
WHOIS record checks – Ownership details are blocked, tracing back to Icelandic anonymization service Withheld for Privacy ehf. This aligns with ScamAdvisor findings.
Address checks – Listed mailing address on WHOIS traces back to Withheld for Privacy ehf headquarters, not unique DataAnnotation Tech offices.
Site contact checks – No phone number or email addresses listed publicly to directly contact company.
Unfortunately without the ability to directly communicate with ownership, or independently verify company infrastructure, there is little solid proof available this is run as a legitimate business.
Final Verdict: Likely a Scam “Business Opportunity”
In summary – The abundance of suspicious activity makes it difficult to recommend DataAnnotation.tech as a legitimate remote work opportunity.
The combination of:
- Overwhelming negative user reviews
- Allegations of missing payments
- Confusing/rigged hiring practices
- Impossible to contact support & ownership
Sets off multiple scam alarm bells.
While it is possible a small subset of early applicants manage to get through the convoluted hiring process before being deactivated later… That would still qualify this as a shady business at best.
And without ownership details or direct contact methods, applicants have little legal recourse in cases of withheld payments or deactivated accounts.
Overall, workers looking for legitimate flexible opportunities would be wise to focus their efforts on more transparent, communicative companies.
There are many authentic data annotation services out there. Don’t waste time playing games guessing if requests for free work assessments are legitimate talent screens or cheap labor tricks.
You might also like: